‘You can’t
teach an old dog new tricks’. Sometimes the old ways are the best ways—relying on one’s instinct, intelligence and
skill, not on a computer or other technology to solve the problem at hand.
Bond’s age and physical limitations in relation to his ability to change and
grow and to meet future challenges are in question here. That is one message in
the movie. But when Eve says to him ‘old dog, new tricks’, we know that the old
dog can learn new tricks, can resurrect himself (his hobby—resurrection), can
be fit for fight, and can seduce the ‘new’ women (Eve included). But I also
thought about how filmmaking and production have changed during the past half
century since the first Bond film. It’s an industry that is constantly
reinventing itself, thanks to new camera and digital techniques and effects—new
tricks in an old trade. The effects are stylish, eye-catching, and atmospheric.
The film works on so many levels; it is seamlessly put together. It is a film
you just slip into, almost as though you found an opening in one dimension that
allows you to step into that world. It glides along on a noiseless track, and
you are pulled onto the monorail that takes you into the world of James Bond.
The use of computer-generated imagery (CGI) certainly helps to create that atmosphere,
that world, almost one of virtual reality; there must have been a lot of CGI in
this film. The intricate and nuanced use of colors and digital effects also
creates the different moods that hold one captive—eerie, bold, violent, beautiful,
and suggestive. I don’t know what the use of colors and digital effects does to
the brain (are they subliminal effects in some way?), but I am sure that a
psychologist or psychiatrist could tell me. I would guess that there is a fair
amount of research being done in the field of marketing to find just the ‘right’
digital effects that will make us want more, enjoy more, buy more. I find these
types of digital effects to be almost addictive; I find myself mesmerized by
the use of streaming and gliding colors and shapes, the dim blue lighting, the
use of light and shadows, glass buildings, color tones, and so forth. The shots
of the digital ads, e.g., the writhing jellyfish, climbing the Shanghai skyscrapers
in the darkness are beautiful and confusing; they create a chaos of shapes and
colors, so that it’s almost impossible to distinguish a real figure from a
shadow. But it all comes together so seamlessly, falling into place in the
brain. The choreography of the fight scene on the edge of the room high in the
clouds; the figures are dark and move like dancers—a beautiful scene. There are
so many of these types of scenes—beautiful, haunting (the long-distance view of
the Skyfall estate house), the landscapes of Scotland—wild and stark, almost
like a painting, interspersed with the views of Shanghai, Istanbul and London. Skyfall is a typical Bond film in that
respect—multiple locations, lunatic villains, over-the-top stunts, but in terms
of its visual effects, it’s so much more.
Showing posts with label James Bond. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Bond. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Watching Skyfall
I finally
got around to watching the latest James Bond film, Skyfall, with Daniel Craig as Bond. I’ve wanted to see it since it
opened at the end of October, but unfortunately there were other more pressing issues
that got in the way until now. Skyfall
is the best of the Bond films, in my opinion. It is a near-perfect film and a
near-perfect film experience, for so many reasons. I’ve watched it twice
already, back-to-back viewings, and the second time I found myself trying to
find flaws in the plot, in the characters, in the acting, in the
cinematography, in the villain, in the Bond women, in Bond himself. I came up
short every time. It is the first Bond film where I could follow the plot
without question, the first Bond film where I could understand the villain’s
motives, the first Bond film that depicts the complexity and the shadowiness of
the espionage world. I found myself thinking of John Le Carre’s book (one of my favorites) A Perfect Spy; mostly because both
delve into the realm of the psyches of their spies. In A Perfect Spy, we learn why the
protagonist Magnus Pym (who works for the British MI6 as a spy and has lived a
lie for his entire life) was the perfect spy, and about the role his con-man father
played in his life, in his moral development (or lack thereof), and in his ultimate
downfall. In Skyfall, we come to
understand that the death of Bond’s parents at an early age made him a good
recruit for the world of espionage. As M (played by Judi Dench) says to him,
‘orphans make the best recruits’. One set of authority figures are replaced by
another set in the form of MI6. The latter are more ruthless, demanding,
amoral and untrustworthy than the first. Bond is really a pawn on a chess
board; he is moved around at will and accepts his role and his fate (‘hire me
or fire me’). Answering the call of duty plays an all-consuming role in how he
sees the world. It’s all he knows. He belongs to the old world of loyalty to
one’s country, less to oneself. One’s body is merely a tool in the service of
one’s country. In that sense, it is completely understandable that the women he
meets are tools as well. That message was also quite clear in A Perfect Spy, and made having a normal
functioning relationship/marriage with a woman impossible. And yet, Bond did
marry once for love, in an earlier film, but his wife was shot and killed. He
remains alone, a loner, needing no one, perhaps because the death of his wife affected
him permanently. That makes it possible for him to be an instrument in the
service of his country. It also explains why he needs to take out the villain
in this film, whose sole aim is to kill M because she has betrayed him; M
provides Bond with his only stable relationship, albeit a superficial one. M
and Bond know what they need to know about each other; the trick is to not
become sentimental with and about each other. Deep down however, they are fond
of one another, as this film touchingly depicts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The four important F's
My friend Cindy, who is a retired minister, sends me different spiritual and inspirational reflections as she comes across them and thinks I...