In The Barretts of Wimpole Street, we meet
Elizabeth Barrett, her sisters and brothers, and their tyrant of a
father, a widower (played by John Gielgud) who refuses to let any of them marry
and who vows to disinherit them if they do. Suffice it to say that the
household atmosphere is stifling and life-killing, with the father determining
how they live, what they eat, who they see, and so forth. It is implied that
the father treated his wife in much the same way as he treats his children; she
may have loved him early on but came to fear him as his children do. He has
absolute control over them, is unkind in word and action, and prefers having
his children fear rather than love him. Elizabeth is an invalid with what seems
to be some sort of heart problem; in truth, her illness is probably a reaction to
her father’s psychological abuse. She is bedridden and her brothers and sisters
try to keep her in good spirits; it is her dog Flush who seems to do the best
job at giving her some sort of happiness, and he plays a major role in the
film. The film is really the story of how Elizabeth comes to life and gets well
after meeting the poet Robert Browning, who has fallen in love with her through
her poetry and who wants to marry her. It doesn’t take Robert long to figure
out that her father is a major cause of her illness and unhappiness. They carry
on their romance in secret, as does Elizabeth’s sister Henrietta with her
Captain. But we know that Elizabeth’s father will eventually find out, and he
does. So the question then becomes, how will they escape their tyrant of a
father? He is truly a scary man; he dominates any room he walks into with his
dourness and life-killing behavior. You could say about him that a flower would
wither in his presence. In a rather sickening scene toward the end of the film,
he tells Elizabeth that he is moving the family out of London to the country to
get away from the bad influences (visits from friends and suitors), and that he
hopes that she will come to love him and not fear him. He then makes the
mistake of professing his feelings for her, which border on incestuous.
Elizabeth understands that he will ultimately destroy her, and that she needs
to get away from him immediately, which she manages with the help of their
housemaid Wilson. The scene where she, with her dog Flush in her arms (she
could not leave him behind) and Wilson are sneaking out of the house while the
rest of the family is sitting down to dinner, is actually terrifying. I kept
waiting for her father to appear, to crush whatever little courage and spirit
was left in her. Had he appeared while she was escaping, he would have won. And
had she left Flush behind, it would have been awful; her father, when he
discovers that Elizabeth and Wilson have gone, orders the dog destroyed. But of
course Elizabeth knew that this would be his fate, and since she loves her dog,
he goes with her. I have never rooted for a character to escape her tyrant the
way I did with Elizabeth; when they paused on the staircase, just a few feet
from the front door, I found myself saying ‘go, leave, get out now’. It would have been
awful had she been stopped. But she does escape, does marry Robert, and Flush
stays with them. It's a true story with a happy ending, in other words, and thank God for that.
Both films
deal with women who want to change their lives and leave unhappiness and abuse
behind. Both women decide to leave their abusers—men who mete out nothing but unkindness,
misery and unhappiness, men who confuse love and control, men who dominate and bark
out orders, men who can say and do things that they would never tolerate from
the women in their lives. It made me appreciate the courage and the energy
these women showed in the face of abuse; they knew they had to leave their situations
and they did. In one case it ended tragically, in the other, it ended happily.
So it goes in life; it’s not always easy to leave an unhappy situation. But the
courage involved in trying to leave is what stays with you long after the films
are over.