The most
poignant scenes in the film are those between Sherry and George, and Sherry and
Faith. Sherry, who is a teenager on the verge of adulthood, is most affected by
her parents’ split, and desperately tries to understand what is going on. She
doesn’t get many clear answers from either parent. What they do manage to
impart to her is how much they love her, despite their own problems. Sherry
gets to see her parents as flawed people; again, this is how real life is. The
scene when she asks her mother why husbands and wives don’t wait for each other
as they pass through doors on their way to new rooms—in essence, why they don’t
share their new experiences with each other—is touching. Or when she asks her
father if he loves Timmy (Sandy’s son) more than his own daughters and George
says no. But Sherry knows (and verbalizes) her doubt about his priorities; she
knows that Timmy will ultimately usurp her and her sisters’ places in their
father’s heart. Sandy will see to that. This is also a reality many people in such
a situation do not want to deal with. It’s easier to lie, to say that nothing will
be different, when of course nothing could be further from the truth. Children
know the truth; they can intuit it. Children in the same family may deal with
their parents’ divorce differently. Sherry is the oldest daughter and the
hardest hit. It’s hard not to sympathize with her anger and confusion. Shoot the Moon is timeless despite its
being thirty years old; it has as much to say to us today about marriage and
divorce as it did when it was made.
Showing posts with label divorce. Show all posts
Showing posts with label divorce. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
About the film Shoot the Moon
I sat and
watched the 1982 film Shoot the Moon
last night on TCM; it has to be at least the tenth time I’ve seen the film. It
is hands-down the best movie I’ve ever seen about marital problems, impending
divorce, and the effects of a broken relationship on children. I love this film
for its raw honesty and the incredible acting of Albert Finney (George), Diane
Keaton (Faith), and Dana Hill (who plays their eldest daughter Sherry). These
are characters that you can actually like and get to know--better put, these
are people that you can relate to. Each time I watch the movie, I realize that the
entire story resembles life—messy, chaotic, no pat answers, situations that are
not explainable or forgivable or black-and-white. There are no easy answers in
this movie, and no contrived happy endings. If you choose to interpret the
ending as a new beginning for the estranged couple, you are a romantic. I am
not so sure, even after the tenth viewing. And that could say more about me
than about the character of Faith, who remains ambiguous about her feelings for
George even after he dumps her for a younger woman (Sandy, played by Karen
Allen) with a small son, moves out, and goes to live with Sandy. I like Faith’s
ambiguity; she isn’t sure what she wants, even when she gets involved with
Frank (played by Peter Weller), who is the contractor she hires to build the
tennis court she has always wanted. She still loves George, even though she
knows that so much of their relationship is irretrievably broken. She is
jealous of Sandy and has no desire to hear about her. She has four daughters to
take care of and does a good job of taking care of them in a difficult
situation. She could have demanded more attention and focus on herself; she
could have wallowed in self pity. But she doesn’t. Her father’s illness and her
mother’s interference in her life are also issues that she deals with, in
addition to the demise of her marriage. This too is the way real life is. You
don’t get to choose all the time what you want to deal with—one problem at a time.
Sometimes there are multiple problems that get dumped on you all at once, and
the only choice you have is to sink or swim. George for his part still loves Faith,
but he is in love with Sandy because she pays attention to him, like Faith used
to before she got totally involved in raising their children. He is also a
jealous person, aggressive, and has an explosive temper; he doesn’t like Frank
and doesn’t like the idea of Frank hanging around his old home getting to know Faith
or his children.
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Sexcapades
This past week the news has been dominated by sex scandals—some of them of an (alleged) illegal criminal nature and some of them not. What they have in common is that the men involved in all cases risked their marriages, personal lives and reputations to live out their different sexual fantasies. Again, I have to ask the question, what were these men thinking? But I know I won’t get a satisfactory answer. Or I’ll get the standard wisecrack answer—they weren’t—it was their second brain that was doing the thinking.
This time it was Arnold Schwarzenegger who ‘took full responsibility’ and stepped up to the proverbial plate to inform us about his extramarital affair with one of his household staff members and the resulting love child. The news was apparently kept secret even from his wife Maria Schriver, who when she heard it from him apparently a few months ago, promptly moved out of the house. They are currently separated and will likely divorce. When I first heard the news I thought, yet another male politician who couldn’t keep his pants zipped. Really, what is the world coming to, I ask you? One politician after another caught up in the arms of sleaze—affairs with household staff/servants (Schwarzenegger and a few of our country’s founding fathers), dabblings with prostitutes (Eliot Spitzer), oral sex with congressional pages and sex with nightclub singers (Bill Clinton), adultery with women sneaked into the White House (John F. Kennedy), adultery with an Argentinian girlfriend (Mark Sanford) and adultery with other (healthy younger) women while their wives struggled with cancer (Newt Gingrich, John Edwards, and a few other men I know of who are not politicians). The latter especially is distressing to read about if you own an iota of empathy, because you know that the news that your husband is fooling around or having children with another woman while you battle cancer cannot be anything other than immensely stressful precisely at the time when you need little to no added extra stress. And how sad to leave this life knowing that your husband was a ‘rotter’ as my mother would have called these types of men. What a thing to forgive, and can you really? What a betrayal—the ultimate betrayal. Even if you did live, could you trust a man again? Again I find it hard to believe that men can behave this way. Of course I know that there are two sides to every story. If I didn’t write that here I’d be reminded of it by some well-meaning person. And I agree, there are two sides to every story. But it’s hard to find equivalently awful stories about female politicians who behave in this way toward their husbands. I’d like to know about them, I really would.
I have been witness to some strange male (and female) relationship behavior during the past thirty years, so I know that bad behavior does happen. I know of married men who traveled under assumed names to meet their lovers so that their wives wouldn’t find out, I know of men who were on message boards and internet dating sites passing themselves off as single when in fact they were married, I know of men who were fooling around with their current wives while their soon-to-be ex-wives were succumbing to cancer, I know of men who strung women along for years telling them that they would marry them and then dropping them the minute they found the woman they ‘wanted to marry’. I know of swinging couples and wife-swappers; of men who lied to women about being ‘separated’ in order to get a woman to sleep with them. I know of men who travel on business who pick up prostitutes and call girls when they are in another city. I know of married men who offered to be sperm donors for single women and whose wives would probably not have appreciated the offers had they known about them. I also know of women (married and single) who have contacted the wives of the men they have decided to seduce, to tell the wives that they and the husbands are very attracted to each other and that if the husband hadn’t been married they would be together. I know of women who pursue married men on social network sites, by email, and via text messages. I know of women who worked for men who told them at the outset that they’d like to be their mistresses, who ended up being so, and who ended up marrying them after causing hell for the wives involved. In Norway alone, infidelity in marriage occurs in one of two marriages according to what I hear from other people and from news reports; I have no way of knowing whether this is true, since most people would never talk about this honestly. In turn, I know of wives who fought back and told some of these women off and told their husbands off at the same time. I know of some women who divorced the louts they were living with. I know of some wives who really fought back—when their husbands went to live with the other women and the scorned wives made their lives a living hell. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. You bet. And maybe it’s good that it is that way at least in some cases. But sometimes I believe in divorce as the solution to painful hellish lives. I’ve seen a number of abusive and depressing marriages during my growing up—drunken men who hit women, eternal flirters and skirt-chasers who were never happy with the women they had at home, or men who always had to have the last word—who controlled their wives and families with an iron fist. And this took place/takes place in Westernized society. So every time people say to me that women have it so much better in our neck of the world, I remind them of this, and then we come down a few notches on the ‘everything is great for women in our society’ scale.
Which brings me to the men and women I know who are unsung heroes in my book. The men and women who have stayed married through thick and thin without cheating, without abuse, without carping. Who start each day with a smile and who never cease to amaze me with their cheerfulness and helpful spirits. Who are loyal and kind to their spouses and children. Who have probably been tempted to leave a few times in their lives, but didn’t, because they put the happiness and needs of their spouses and families ahead of their own. Who stuck by spouses in times of sickness—the true test of love. I’ve seen what sickness in one or the other partner can do to relationships, so I know it’s not easy. Loyalty is underrated in our society these days. But it is what makes marriages and friendships last. Without it, there can’t really be much trust. You have to be able to see into the future and ‘know’ with your gut that the person you share your life with will be there for you when you are sick, when you need help, and vice versa. No one said it would be easy. Maybe you’d like to run at the first sign of trouble. But maybe you didn’t; maybe you wrestled with your doubt and anxiety and temptation and stayed put. These are the people who impress me. You don’t need to climb Mt. Everest or practice extreme sports or any of those things to impress me. ‘That don’t impress me much’, as Shania Twain sang a few years ago. What does impress me is longevity and the ability to be positive and cheerful in a marriage. I’m not saying that all people should stay together for an entire lifetime; I’ve already argued for divorce as a solution to hellish relationships. But if after some years of being together, an otherwise decent marriage loses a bit of its luster and temptation comes one’s way, maybe one should take a closer look at what one has before tossing it away for a sexcapade. It is possible to stay faithful, and I know couples married for forty or more years who have been faithful to one another. They say so, they are still in love with their spouses, and they are my heroes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
The Spinners--It's a Shame
I saw the movie The Holiday again recently, and one of the main characters had this song as his cell phone ringtone. I grew up with this mu...